For the land owners in section 31

To be added as a person able to create new posts (rather than just reply), you must send an email to the webmaster@section31roads.com and request blog authoring ability. Your valid email address is required.

Friday, August 17, 2007

8/17 Meeting

Well, hi and welcome,

I made it to the meeting, (a bit late). was actually a good meeting. our guest speaker did a good job, and i think he explained how the road maintaince thing works. I can not explain it here, but will get the notes from his speech posted soon as i can.

I think most of us in attendance ended up leaning toward liking what they did. (i apologize if i am wrong).

we would have much more control over what is done with the tax money collected than i thought we would. Main thing I got from it. no improvements from it, just better and scheduled maintaince on the roads. we could control what and when. any movement of roads would be our own thing to do. With the large amount of owners in section 31, and the tax collected by already documented county property values, seemed a more equatable way to slice up the collection pie. Again, if i am reporting incorrectly, it's just what i have from memory. more official documentation will be posted very soon.. maybe by Sunday or Monday evening.

there were 52 people in the room (i did count). Lots of good ideas exchanged.

Well, that's all i really know for now, just wanted to let everyone know we did have the meeting, and the conversations were productive.

see ya all around, Quad.

1 comments:

hayshaker said...

I was not able to attend this last meeting as I was out of state at the time. My main question on the road maintenance arrangement, concerns the comment that the county man made a couple of meetings ago, that the first thing that would happen under that arrangement would be that the roads would have to be surveyed (at a pretty high price tag as I recall) since many of them do not follow the private easements. I understood that no work could be done on them unless they were resurveyed and easements established for where the road currently runs or relocate the road where the easement is. We all know that that would be an almost impossible snarl. Adjoining property owners would probably not even agree. Victory Heights roads are running where the easements are. I think we need to get this point cleared up so we know what we are facing.